|
State University
perched on the open blackland prairie. Here he would flourish, not
only earning two degrees (bachelors and masters in English,
1963 and 65) but also cultivating a companionship with the
quiet man who would forever affect his own practice of ChristianityDr.
Paul Barrus.
At first, however,
East Texas State, as he (admittedly stubbornly) still calls it,
wasnt where Ralph really wanted to be. Baylor was the place
where Baptist preachers are supposed to go, and Ralph
meant to be a minister. But like many whove found their way
to A&M-Commerce, Ralph could better manage this Universitys
tuition, which was about $200 a year compared to Baylors $2,000.
These days, however, Ralph says its clear there was more at
work than the pinching of his pennies; there was the hand of providence.
Had I
not gone to East Texas State, I never would have met Paul Barrus,
never have studied under a Catholic professor, he says. (Baylor
now has a number of Catholic faculty but at that time had none.)
Dr. Barrus, one of the Universitys most beloved professors,
was Ralphs literature professor, but he also would become
a spiritual mentor to the young student. Paul Barrus introduced
me to the wider world of Christendom, exploding the myths I had
about Catholics. Which just happened to prove crucial to his
own career, Ralph says, since he would spend a good deal of time
teaching a number of Catholic writers, including Flannery OConnor,
a favorite.
But life wasnt
always so immediately decipherable. Ralphs roommate committed
suicide. A teacher died. So did his own father.
He says, Questions
pressed in very hard.
Forced to confront
tragedy and rejecting easy answers, he would plumb the darkness
and depths of his faith.
Helping him
do so was Dr. Barrus. When my college roommate committed suicide
during his first year of medical studies, I went straight to Paul
Barrus office for consolation and instruction, Ralph
would say later. But it was also the professors sympathetic
teaching of both Christian and atheist writers that would profoundly
affect Ralphs approach to his own grief. Through Dr. Barrus,
Ralph embraced the role honest doubt could play in developing a
deeper faith in the face of tragedy.
Years later
Ralph would write In Defense of Disbelief in which he
states: A healthy dose of Christian disbelief or holy
skepticism would serve as a much-needed antidote to the soft-core
spirituality that saps much of contemporary Christianity . . .
Its no
surprise then that Ralphs students tackle the great works,
both the faith-filled and the faithless, of authors from St. Augustine
to Kafka. Im convinced, Ralph says earnestly,
that Christianity has to confront all that counts against
itall the tough challenges it must face in order to be valid
and convincing in our lives.
His continuing
fascination with how literature addresses the dynamics of faith
and doubt would eventually lead him to the fulfillment of his dreamteaching
a combination of religion and literature. And teaching it at Baylor,
for that matter. Make that two dreams come true.
In 1998 Baylor
administrators named Ralph the first of only four University Professorsa
program described as one that would enhance the schools reputation
by bringing in high-profile scholars as permanent faculty members.
From East Texas
sandy uplands and then ETSUs blacklands to Wacos flatlands,
its a journey that may well have snapped Ralphs good
judgment, because he professes to find Waco lovely.
Baylors
setting is one of barren beauty, he claims, and for
good measure throws in an OConnor quote: When you dont
have much to look at, you look at it very carefully.
And that in
itself may explain part of his enthusiasm for OConnor, who
penned fewer works than many authors of her importance. Apparently,
though, what she lacks in volume, Ralph makes up for with his own.
As in the volume of his guffaws when he reads her. I find
her uproariously funny, he admits. I never read her
without bursting out in laughter.
For the record,
a couple of OConnors more well-known quotes include:
Being a Georgia author is a rather specious dignity, on the
same order as, for the pig, being a Talmadge ham, and I
have found that anything that comes out of the South is going to
be called grotesque by the Northern reader, unless it is grotesque,
in which case it is going to be called realistic.
Theyre
the kind of OConnor lines that call for a wholehearted hoot,
at least for Ralph, who rarely seems to find anything to recommend
in a halfhearted response.
His notion that
moderation might not be a particularly credible position began with
Dr. Barrus, whose witness led Ralph to confront the fact that to
be Christian is to go against the grain of the world.
Christianity
is radical, Ralph says. Faith is drastic and stark.
It makes a real difference. Moderation may be a great political
virtue, but it is a religious vice.
Which makes
it all the more interesting that he is a professor in the Truett
Seminary.
Last year the
Baptist General Convention of Texas voted to redirect $4.3 million
from six Southern Baptist seminaries to more moderate
ones, including Truett, which stands to get $1.3 million a year.
That kind of
moneyan amount that would make a hefty one-time gift, much
less an annual onewill mean Truett can grow and produce
more and better students, Ralph says. Truett can leave
behind its status as a struggling seminary and become a thriving
one.
Nevertheless,
Ralph says, I would not apply the word moderate
to myself, and he will continue his efforts to expunge the
word from even his students vocabulary.
Though the current
conflicts between more liberal and conservative Baptists have netted
Truett some good fortune, both sides are guilty of mistakes, Ralph
suggests.
Matters
have been dealt with so badly on both sides, he says. To
conservatives the Bible is a book of wooden rules, and liberals
attribute to Scripture an equally wooden accommodationism.
The ultimate
criteria for our actions should be Christ, he explains. While conservatives
would have wives submit to their husbands, he says, and liberals
would have them grasping for a secular version of equality, the
Bible says a husband rules a wife by dying to her.
By the
worlds standard, thats no standard at allbecause
what man will really do that? he asks. Its the kind
of human perspective that makes the debate a sterile one that
misses the heart of the matter, Ralph says.
Were all to be mutually submissive to one another,
he says. Both sides miss that.
Ralph once said
that Dr. Barrus had a sterling integrity of mind and
a deep generosity of heart. And what will he want said
of himself?
That I
was faithful to my calling, which, as it turns out, wasnt
to preach but teach. I teach, not because I disdain preaching,
but because I revere it. I tell my students I dont marry,
bury, baptize, or serve Holy Communion as they will. I dont
pray with people as theyre dying or as their children are
born.
His calling
may be one he defines as secondary to that of his students,
but I have no regrets, he says with assurance. I
may not have found something higher than preaching, but Ive
found something to love. Immoderately so.
|