|
Academic
Honesty

Students
Graduate students at Texas A&M University-Commerce are expected to maintain
high standards of integrity and honesty in all their scholastic work. Faculty are expected
to uphold and support student integrity and honesty by maintaining conditions that
encourage and enforce academic honesty. Conduct that violates generally accepted
standards of academic honesty is defined as academically dishonest. “Academic dishonesty”
includes, but is not limited to, plagiarism (the appropriation or stealing of ideas
or works of another and passing them off as one’s own), cheating on exams or other
course assignments, collusion (the unauthorized collaboration with others in preparing
course assignments) and abuse (destruction, defacing, or removal) of resource material.
If a student is accused of academic dishonesty, the faculty member making the
accusation is responsible for initiating disciplinary proceedings. The penalty assessed
should be related to the severity of the infraction. If the student and faculty member agree
on the penalty, assessment of the penalty concludes the disciplinary action.
However, certain violations of academic honesty, such as plagiarism, infringe upon
the academic community’s basic tenets of scholarly inquiry. Therefore, if a faculty
member believes the infraction is severe enough to warrant further action and/or if the
problem may be cumulative, occurring in other classes in which the student is enrolled,
the faculty member may file a report of the infraction with the Dean of Graduate Studies
and Research. The student must be notified that the report has been filed with the
Dean of Graduate Studies and Research so as to allow the student the opportunity to file
a response. If a faculty member believes the infraction is so severe that a penalty greater
than failure on a project and/or course is warranted, the faculty member may recommend
to the Dean of Graduate Studies and Research through the department head and academic
dean that the student be suspended or expelled.
If the student disagrees with the charge or level of penalty, he/she is entitled to due
process in accordance with the University policy for student appeals. The appeal process
for this policy is through the following channels: department head, Dean of Graduate
Studies and Research and the Administration Committee of the Graduate Council
which will present its recommendation to the full Graduate Council for final disposition
of the appeal. Final jurisdiction on graduate student appeals is the Graduate Council.
In addition, international students must comply with Immigration and Naturalization
Statutes, for example, Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.
Good Standing Rule
This policy defines good standing for graduate students enrolled at A&M-Commerce.
Entering students who have been fully admitted (without any type of probationary
admission, provisional admission, or other restriction) will be considered in good
standing. A student will remain in good standing if, and only if, he or she has a cumulative
grade point average of at least 3.00 and is free of the following holds: holds indicating
delinquent financial indebtedness, academic suspension, academic probation,
provisional status, and disciplinary suspension.
Students who are not in good standing will not be able to graduate until good standing
has been achieved.
Faculty and Professional Staff
Graduate faculty and professional staff at Texas A&M University-Commerce are expected
to maintain high standards of integrity and honesty in all their scholastic work. Faculty
are expected to uphold and support integrity and honesty by maintaining conditions
that encourage and enforce academic honesty. “Academic dishonesty” includes, but is not
limited to, plagiarism (the appropriation or stealing of the ideas or words of another and
passing them off as one’s own), cheating, collusion (the unauthorized collaboration with
others), and abuse (destruction, defacing, or removal) of resource material.
If a faculty or staff member is accused of academic dishonesty, the department head
or supervisor is responsible for initiating a timely investigation. Any necessary discipline
actions that result from this investigation should be related to the severity of the infraction.
If a faculty or staff member disagrees with the charge or level of penalty, he/she is
entitled to due process in accordance with the usual procedures available to faculty who
are accused of any other infraction.

Back
to Admission Information
|