ANIMAL WASTE AND SEWAGE SLUDGE DECOMPOSITION
AND UTILIZATION AS A PEAT MOSS SUBSTITUTE

TEXAS-ISRAELI EXCHANGE FUND PROGRAM GRANTS

FINAL COMPLIANCE NARRATIVE

July, 1996


Project Summary
Technical & Economic Content
Key Personnel
Project Contacts



Links to specific projects in this compliance report:

Name of Grantee: Texas A&M University-Commerce

TDA file number: 459107

Period covered by report: June 15, 1995 through June 15, 1996

Principal Investigator: Donald L. Cawthon

Project summary: Agriculture has been identified as the single largest contributor to nonpoint source pollution in the United States. Over one-third of all agricultural nonpoint source pollution impairments are caused by waste from livestock confined animal feeding operations (CAFO's). CAFO operators are required to confine all animal waste products and operate under a "no-discharge" policy into creeks and watersheds. This project developed the technology to stabilize and convert solid animal waste into a peat moss substitute marketable to the horticultural industry; thereby converting a watershed liability (animal waste) into an income generating source of revenue for a CAFO operator, and providing a competitive option for imported peat moss. Enhanced sustainability of both confined animal feeding operations and horticultural industries should result.

Following preliminary feasibility studies initiated in 1993 by the investigators, this project was initiated in June, 1995 to 1) identify and implement the composting technology necessary to convert solid animal waste and municipal sewage sludge into an organic product for use in the horticultural industry, 2) determine the feasibility of co-composting animal wastes and sewage sludge with other waste biomass, 3) develop the production practices necessary to utilize the composted products as a substitute for peat moss in the plant nursery industry, 4) document microbial and enzymatic parameters of decomposition and develop means for reducing heavy metal availability, and 5) document the economics of production, marketing, and utilization of the product.

Sewage sludge and CAFO wastes from dairy, cattle feedlot and poultry operations were composted with and without use of bulking agent biomass for textural modification and moisture regulation. Composting was by windrow (Israel) and in-vessel aerobic techniques (Texas). The microbial parameters were monitored throughout the composting process, and the chemical and physical properties were documented at compost completion. Microbial, chemical, and physical properties of the composts and subsequent growing media blends were related to plant growth, dry weight accumulation, general appearance, and tissue nutrient content.

Dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush and dry-scrape techniques, poultry litter from broiler operations, and sewage sludge from the belt-press facility in Sulphur Springs, Texas have all been evaluated for suitability as a peat moss substitute in soilless growing media used for marigold bedding plant production. Additionally, use of bulking agents (fine and coarse textured sawdust and hay) as a carbon source during composting and for moisture absorption have been evaluated. Studies determining the need for supplemental nitrogen to aid in the composting process have also been completed.

Properly composted dairy cattle manure, whether collected by hydraulic flush or dry-scrape techniques, can be substituted for peat moss in a soilless growing media for marigold production without a loss of plant quality. Due to the texture of composted dairy manure collected by hydraulic flush techniques, plants were successfully grown in 100% compost without the addition of more expensive vermiculite and/or perlite typically used in a peat-lite blend when peat moss is used. Composted poultry litter may have limited utility as a peat moss substitute for bedding plant production due to high nitrogen and high total salt concentration. However, use of a compost blend containing between 12.5 or 25% poultry litter may be acceptable for some applications. Addition of 12.5 to 25% poultry litter with dairy manure increased the rate of composting as indicated by composting temperature. Sewage sludge did not generate the temperatures experienced during composting of either dairy or poultry waste, but appears (data not yet analyzed) to produce excellent quality plants in a greenhouse situation.

Fresh dairy manure collected by hydraulic flush techniques from a confined animal facility averages between 70 and 75% moisture. This moisture level was found to be too high to achieve aerobic composting due to a lack of porosity and oxygen availability. Either partial drying of the animal waste prior to composting or use of bulking agents to absorb excess moisture and improve porosity were necessary to achieve adequate composting. The use of bulking agents with wet dairy manure was detrimental to subsequent plant growth. However, supplemental nitrogen applied at the rate of 0.37% actual N (dry wt. basis) overcame the detrimental effects of bulking agent addition. Use of a bulking agent of high carbon content such as sawdust or hay in conjunction with a low nitrogen containing manure from a hydraulic flush collection system probably restricts nitrogen availability to plants. Co-composting of a high-carbon bulking agent with poultry litter was beneficial to plant growth due to the high nitrogen content of poultry litter.

A 24 cubic yard in-vessel aerobic composter modeled from the prototype composters used in this project has been manufactured and installed on a 400-cow dairy near Como, Texas. The economics of operating this composting facility has been estimated using actual installation costs and estimated annual fixed and variable costs. Annual fixed costs include depreciation, insurance, taxes and land value which is used for the composting site. Variable costs include electricity, fuel, labor, repairs, and maintenance. Details of the annual and fixed costs are outlined in Table 27 in the data appendix of this report.

The composter currently in operation at the Vellenga Dairy is a model 0824 composter which can be purchased for $73,625.00. Installation of a separator which separates the liquid waste from the solid waste is valued at $15,000.00. Cement slabs and structures to support the composter are estimated at $1,200.00. Additional concrete pad valued at $1,250.00 is required for product storage and handling. Approximately 1 acre of land valued at $550.00 is needed to house this composting system. In this operation a $30,000.00, 90 horsepower tractor equipped with a 2.5 yd3 front end loader is used approximately 25% of the time for composter loading and unloading.

A 400 cow freestall dairy barn produces approximately 6 yd3 of solid waste material per day to be composted. A market price of $20.00 per cubic yard for composted material has been offered to the Vellenga Dairy. Total income from compost sales (6 yd3/day x 365 days/yr x $20.00/yd3) is estimated at $43,800.00, providing and estimated net income of $14,972.54 (see Table 27).

Technical and economic content: In-vessel, on-farm composting of solid animal wastes from CAFO's (including dairy, poultry, and feedlot operations) offers several advantages to the Texas agricultural community and the general citizenry of the state. Animal wastes become a liability when over-supply must be applied to limited land area, resulting in high soil accumulation of nutrients, runoff carrying nutrients and microbial contaminants into surface waterways, and leaching of nutrients and fecal microorganisms into underground water resources.

CAFO operators can convert solid animal waste from a potential liability into a large-scale marketable product, thereby removing the waste from a potentially endangered watershed. Prevention of excessive nutrient loading and pollution improves the sustainability of agricultural operations and helps protect the environment for all citizens. Marketing of composted animal waste as a peat moss substitute will provide an additional source of income for a CAFO while being a good steward of Texas' natural resources and its environment.

The horticultural industry in Texas, including greenhouse and outdoor containerized plant production as well as landscape operations, is a major user of peat moss. Basically all peat moss used in the state is imported from Canada. To achieve marketshare and become competitive with Canadian peat moss, composted animal waste/peat moss substitutes must be produced using suitable quality control guidelines and should be consistent, reproducible, and of high quality. On-farm, in-vessel composting technology offers the advantage of control over the complete production process including control of aeration, temperature, and moisture, which comprise the key criteria for producing a consistently high quality compost product.

To successfully mass market composted animal waste/peat moss substitutes to either the wholesale user or the retail trade, cooperative approaches between producers may be advantageous to generate increased volume as well as allow blending to improve quality and reduce variation.


Key personnel:

Donald L. Cawthon has served as project leader. Cawthon's background is in production horticulture, with emphasis in fruit and vegetable production and greenhouse production and management.

Mr. Klaus Vellenga, owner and operator of Vellenga Dairy, Como, Texas.

Mr. John Willis, owner of Dairyland Automation, Inc. Constructed in-vessel composters used in this project.

Mr. Bernie Beers, owner of BW Organics. Designed in-vessel composters used in this project and is currently merchandising composted animal waste as a peat moss substitute.

Mr. Bobby Nobles, owner and operator of Nobel's Poultry Farm.

Several graduate students working towards completion of their MS degrees have been involved with our composting projects. These students include Chris Donaho, Todd Freeman, Brad Robertson, Shawn Nowlin, Lynn Rawe, Jose Perez, and Ravi Malik.

Future plans: As a result of research conducted in part by this TIE project, a three-year implementation and demonstration grant (not a research grant) has been obtained from EPA and the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board to install a commercial sized on-farm in-vessel composter to compost the animal waste generated on a 400-cow freestall dairy in Como, Texas. This project will document and monitor NPS nutrient loading reductions in the Lake Fork Creek Watershed from the Como dairy and will generate sufficient quantity of composted dairy cattle solid waste to be adequately tested on commercial scale by the Texas greenhouse bedding plant industry.

The following projects have been proposed in the recently submitted grant proposal to the 1996-97 TIE Program:

  1. In-vessel, mechanical composting of poultry mortality as an environmentally appropriate disposal alternative to burial, incineration, or static-bin composting.
  2. Expand animal waste compost utilization research into other plant production industries including:
  1. Evaluate the utilization of composted animal waste as a soil amendment (in place of peat moss) in landscape installation activities.

REFERENCES

For the Project Entitled

ANIMAL WASTE AND SEWAGE SLUDGE DECOMPOSITION

AND UTILIZATION AS A PEAT MOSS SUBSTITUTE

July, 1996


Dr. Donald L. Cawthon
Professor & Head
Department of Agricultural Sciences
Texas A&M University-Commerce
Commerce, Texas 75429-3011

Ph: 903-886-5350
Fax: 903-886-5990
E-mail: Don_Cawthon@tamu-commerce.edu
 

Mr. John Willis
Dairyland Automation, Inc.
150 Houston St.
Sulphur Springs, Texas 75482

Ph: 903-885-3131
 

Mr. Bernie Beers
BW Organics
150 Houston St.
Sulphur Springs, Texas 75482

Ph: 903-885-7145
 

Mr. Klaus Vellenga
Vellenga Dairy
Rt. 1 Box 30
Como, Texas 75431

Ph: 903- 488-2802


DATA APPENDIX
 

SUMMARY DATA FOR THE TIE PROJECT ENTITLED:

ANIMAL WASTE AND SEWAGE SLUDGE DECOMPOSITION

AND UTILIZATION AS A PEAT MOSS SUBSTITUTE
 
 
 

REPRESENTATIVE COMPOST TEMPERATURES SOLID DAIRY WASTE




Project to evaluate the use of dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush and dry scrape collection techniques and poultry litter when composted alone or with sawdust as a bulking agent.
 

Table 1. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on marigold growth and appearance when produced in soilless growing media prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.

Treatment
Missing plants
Plant height
Plant
dry wt.
Leaf color
Degree of
flowering

General appear.

Rep .3168 .6353 .1521 .2355 .0078 .7374
Organic matter (OM) .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001
Vermiculite (V) .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0709 .0001
OM*V .0001 .0254 .1664 .0350 .0147 .0094

 
 
Table 2. Main effects of organic matter and vermiculite on marigold growth and appearance when produced in soilless growing media prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.
Main effect
Missing
plants
(no.)
Plant height
(cm)
Plant
dry wt.Z
(g)
Leaf
colorY
(1-5)
Degree of
floweringY
(1-5)
General
appear.Y
(1-5)
Organic matter
Peat moss 0bS 15b 19a 3.7b 2.7b 3.3b
Separated dairyX  
0% sawdustW 0b 16a 21a 4.2a 3.5a 3.9a
50% sawdustV 0b 12c 14b 2.8c 2.9b 2.4d
Dry scrape dairyU  
50% sawdustV 0b 13c 14b 3.0c 3.8a 2.9c
Poultry litterT  
50% sawdustV 17a 9d 10c 2.0d 1.5c 1.5e
Verm. (%)
0 7a 12c 13c 2.7b 2.6b 2.4b
25 3b 13b 16b 3.2a 2.9ab 2.9a
50 0c 15a 18a 3.5a 3.1a 3.1a
Z Total weight of above ground plant parts.
Y Rated on a scale of 1-5, with 5 = best.
X Dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and separated from liquid effluent.
W 100% waste composted without addition of sawdust as a bulking agent.
V Waste mixed 50/50 with sawdust as a bulking agent and composted.
U Dairy cattle solid waste collected without using hydraulic flush techniques.
T Litter from a broiler facility using sawdust as bedding.
S Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

Figure 1. Interactive effects of organic matter source and vermiculite on height of Marigold bedding plants.

Table 3. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on nutrient content of unused soilless growing media prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.
Treatment
pH
Salinity
N
P
K
Na
Ca
Mg
S
Rep .1817 .0515
.6655
.5311 .2148 .2650 .8667 .0136 .5676
Organic matter (OM) .0001 .0001
.0001
.0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001
Vermiculite (V) .1318 .0001
.0001
.0002 .0001 .0001 .0046 .0001 .0016
OM*V .4489 .1331
.0001
.0093 .0001 .0001 .0393 .0024 .0045

 
 
Table 4. Main effects of organic matter and vermiculite on nutrient content of unused soilless growing media prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.
Main
effect
 

pH
Salinity
(ppm)
N
(ppm)
P
(ppm)
K
(ppm)
Na
(ppm)
Ca
(ppm)
Mg
(ppm)
S
(ppm)
Organic matter  
Peat moss 7.9aU 800d 18d 100c 184c 4393b 121d 266c 52c
Separated dairyZ
0% sawdustY 6.7c 2038c 192b 319c 704b 2310b 257bc 497b 56c
50% sawdustX 6.9c 2830cd 1d 149c 399c 2015 211cd 312c 123c
Dry scrape dairyW  
50% sawdustX 7.6b 3458b 91c 601b 965b 1829b 328b 634b 372b
Poultry litterV  
50% sawdustX 7.7ab 7000a 293a 2743a 3369a 21592a 1204a 1186a 736a
Verm. (%)  
0 7.5a 4335a 186a 972a 1695a 583a 8128a 723a 327a
25 7.4ab 2725b 110b 871a 1158b 451b 6850a 635a 298a
50 7.2b 1688c 61c 504b 520c 239c 4306b 381b 178b
Z Dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and separated from liquid effluent.
Y 100% waste composted without addition of sawdust as a bulking agent.
X Waste mixed 50/50 with sawdust as a bulking agent and composted.
W Dairy cattle solid waste collected without using hydraulic flush techniques.
V Litter from a broiler facility using sawdust as bedding.
U Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

Figure 2. Interactive effects of organic matter source and vermiculite on nitrogen content of soilless growing used for Marigold bedding plant production.


 
Table 5. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on nutrient content of used soilless growingmedia prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.
Treatment
pH
Salinity
N
P
K
Na
Ca
Mg
S
Rep
.0001
.0001
.0095
.0917
.8108
.8417
.2134
.7238
.7068
Organic matter (OM)
.0001
.1149
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0019
.0001
.0001
.0001
Vermiculite (V)
.3785
.5516
.6801
.0001
.0001
.2178
.0001
.0001
.0006
OM*V
.2603
.5166
.3340
.0001
.0026
.1134
.0030
.0001
.4706

 
 
 
Table 6. Main effects of organic matter and vermiculite on nutrient content of used soilless growing media prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.
Main
effect
 

pH
Salinity
(ppm)
N
(ppm)
P
(ppm)
K
(ppm)
Na
(ppm)
Ca
(ppm)
Mg
(ppm)
S
(ppm)
Organic matter  
Peat moss 7.5bU 1554b 79a 178d 92d 375c 2030b 210e 38b
Separated dairyZ  
0% sawdustY 7.1c 1729ab 34b 368c 363c 530ba 1242bc 431c 54b
50% sawdustX 7.1c 1504b 6c 210d 378c 422c 1139c 302d 39b
Dry scrape dairyW  
50% sawdustX 7.6b 2192ab 2c 721b 559b 445bc 908c 569b 109a
Poultry litterV  
50% sawdustX 8.2a 2513a 7c 2674a 874a 537a 8430a 824a 123a
Verm. (%)  
0 7.6a 1930a 29a 1123a 696a 496a 2826a 596a 93a
25 7.5a 2068a 25a 794b 400b 450a 2339b 439b 66b
50 7.5a 1698a 23a 574c 265c 439a 2085b 366c 59b
Z Dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and separated from liquid effluent.
Y 100% waste composted without addition of sawdust as a bulking agent.
X Waste mixed 50/50 with sawdust as a bulking agent and composted.
W Dairy cattle solid waste collected without using hydraulic flush techniques.
V Litter from a broiler facility using sawdust as bedding.
U Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

 
 
Table 7. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on tissue nutrient content of marigolds produced in soilless growing media prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.
Treatment
N
P
K
Ca
Mg
Na
Zn
Fe
Cu
Mn
Rep
.0339
.5798
.4743
.5881
.7567
.3899
.0013
.0787
.3960
.0001
Organic matter (OM)
.4859
.3763
.3134
.6412
.0031
.0011
.0001
.1582
.1899
.0001
Vermiculite (V)
.6920
.2941
.4377
.8218
.5690
.0088
.6429
.0022
.9211
.5344
OM*V
.7096
.6194
.8995
.8430
.3791
.0012
.9846
.2789
.9120
.6860

 
 
 
 
Table 8. Main effects of organic matter and vermiculite on tissue nutrient content of marigolds produced in soilless growing media prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.
Main
effect
N
(%)
P
(%)
K
(%)
Ca
(%)
Mg
(%)
Na
(ppm)
Zn
(ppm)
Fe
(ppm)
Cu
(ppm)
Mn
(ppm)
Organic matter  
Peat moss 3.4aU .93a 8.9ab 1.3a .632b 2906c 97cd 149b 13.8b 200c
Separated dairyZ  
0% sawdustY 3.6a 1.69a 9.3a 1.1a .707b 3182bc 574a 174ab 19.6a 389b
50% sawdustX 3.7a .96a 8.4b 1.1a .629b 3228bc 261b 288a 15.3ab 483ab
Dry scrape dairyW  
50% sawdustX 3.4a 1.02a 8.7ab 1.1a .806a 3393b 229bc 159b 15.0ab 615a
Poultry litterV  
50%sawdustX 3.3a .98a 9.0ab 1.3a .722ab 3790a 89d 161b 18.3ab 180c
Verm. (%)  
0 3.4a .90a 9.1a 1.1a .678a 3021b 278a 115b 16.4a 396a
25 3.5a 1.41a 8.7a 1.2a .702a 3399a 242a 156b 16.0a 389a
50 3.6a 1.03a 8.7a 1.2a .717a 3481a 230a 287a 16.9a 335a
Z Dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and separated from liquid effluent.
Y 100% waste composted without addition of sawdust as a bulking agent.
X Waste mixed 50/50 with sawdust as a bulking agent and composted.
W Dairy cattle solid waste collected without using hydraulic flush techniques.
V Litter from a broiler facility using sawdust as bedding.
U Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

 
 
 
Table 9. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on leachate analysis of soilless growing media prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.
Treatment
pH
Salinity
NO3
PO4
K
Ca
Mg
Na
Cl
B
HCO3
Rep
.0005
.4201
.1140
.0845
.0133
.3581
.3944
.0023
.1723
.0197
.6548
Organic matter (OM)
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
Vermiculite (V)
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0085
.0248
.0001
.0131
.0001
.0030
OM*V
.4482
.0010
.0001
.0001
.0001
.1041
.1201
.0001
.3736
.0002
.4464

 
 
Table 10. Main effects of organic matter and vermiculite on leachate analysis of soilless growing media prepared from assorted composted animal wastes.
Main
effect
pH
Salinity
(ppm)
NO3
(ppm)
PO4
(ppm)
K
(ppm)
Ca
(ppm)
Mg
(ppm)
Na
(ppm)
Cl
(ppm)
B
(ppm)
HCO3
(ppm)
Organic matter  
Peat moss 6.7dU 484c 1d .2d 14e 19a 5c 20e 17d .11d .05c
Separated dairyZ  
0% sawdustY 6.9c 1079b 39b 2.3b 159c 19a 18b 66c 132bc .28b .10b
50% sawdustX 6.5e 487c 0d 1.1c 63d 6c 4c 44d 50cd .23cb .03c
Dry scrape dairyW  
50% sawdustX 7.3b 1460b 7c 1.8b 243b 15b 24a 92b 145b .17cd .11b
Poultry litterV  
50% sawdustX 8.0a 3678a 53a 6.7a 742a 14b 23ba 269a 341a .78a .24
Verm. (%)  
0 7.2a 18833a 32a 3.3a 349a 16a 17a 124a 191a .40a .12a
25 7.1a 1547a 18b 2.4b 242b 16a 16a 100b 130ab .30b .12a
50 7.0b 933b 10c 1.5c 141c 12b 12b 71c 89b .25b .08b
Z Dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and separated from liquid effluent.
Y 100% waste composted without addition of sawdust as a bulking agent.
X Waste mixed 50/50 with sawdust as a bulking agent and composted.
W Dairy cattle solid waste collected without using hydraulic flush techniques.
V Litter from a broiler facility using sawdust as bedding.
U Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

 

Project to evaluate the use of dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques when composted with and without supplemental nitrogen fertilizer and with and without sawdust as a bulking agent.
 
 

Table 11. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on marigold growth and appearance when produced in soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.

Treatment
Plant
height
Plant
dry wt.
Leaf
color
Degree of
flowering
General
appear.
Rep
.0002
.1822
.3240
.0025
.0759
Sawdust (S)
.0020
.0022
.0001
.8767
.0001
Nitrogen (N)
.0010
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0011
Vermiculite (V)
.0001
.0001
.0304
.2924
.2573
S*N
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0004
.0001
S*V
.0514
.1937
.5956
.0167
.1669
N*V
.2744
.9650
.1550
.3182
.8402
S*N*V
.0311
.0151
.0865
.4406
.5824

 
 
 
Table 12. Main effects of media and vermiculite on marigold growth and appearance when produced in soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.
Main
effect
Plant height
(cm)
Plant
dry wt.
(g)
Leaf
colorZ
(1-5)
Degree of
floweringZ
(1-5)
General
appear.Z
(1-5)
Sawdust (%)Y
0 16.0aW 21.6a 4.3a 2.4a 3.5a
50 14.8b 19.7b 3.9b 2.3a 3.0b
Nitrogen (%)X
0 14.4b 17.5b 3.5c 3.2a 3.1b
0.37 15.9a 21.5a 4.3b 2.4b 3.1b
0.75 15.9a 23.0a 4.5a 1.5c 3.5a
Verm. (%)
0 14.2c 18.5c 4.0b 2.2a 3.2a
25 15.5b 20.9b 4.1ab 2.4a 3.3a
50 16.5a 22.5c 4.2a 2.5a 3.3a
Z Rated on a scale of 1-5 with 5=best.
Y Percentage sawdust mixed with dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and composted.
X Percent actual nitrogen added to compost on a dry weight basis using ammonium sulfate as the N source.
W Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

 




Figure 3. Interactive effects of % sawdust and % nitrogen addition to composting dairy cattle solid waste on height of Marigold bedding plants.




Figure 4. Interactive effects of % sawdust and % nitrogen addition to composting dairy cattle solid waste on dry weight accumulation of Marigold bedding plants.
 
 


Figure 5. Interactive effects of % sawdust and % nitrogen addition to composting dairy cattle solid waste on visual leaf color of Marigold bedding plants.
 
 
 

Table 13. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on nutrient content of unused soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.
Treatment
pH
Salinity
N
P
K
Na
Ca
Mg
S
Rep
.8070
.0521
.3551
.0946
.2508
.0067
.1347
.0354
.3284
Sawdust (S)
.0001
.0002
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0308
.0198
.0001
.0001
Nitrogen (N)
.0001
.0001
.0001
.6454
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
Vermiculite (V)
.0107
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0006
.0001
.0001
S*N
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.2026
.0001
.0001
S*V
.0264
.9608
.0001
.0324
.0017
.2466
.0518
.0005
.1768
N*V
.0005
.2935
.0001
.7877
.0001
.0029
.0388
.0001
.0001
S*N*V
.6788
.2147
.0001
.2134
.0010
.0147
.2619
.0316
.4356

 
 
Table 14. Main effects of organic matter and vermiculite on nutrient content of unused soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.
Main
effect
pH
Salinity
(ppm)
N
(ppm)
P
(ppm)
K
(ppm)
Na
(ppm)
Ca
(ppm)
Mg
(ppm)
S
(ppm)
Sawdust(%)Z  
0 6.4aX 2747b 84a 290a 623a 231a 1593a 407a 551b
50 6.1b 4190a 8b 199b 487b 217b 1315b 328b 1024a
Nitrogen (%)Y  
0 6.8a 1660c 97a 234a 552b 234a 2163a 405a 90c
0.37 6.3b 2825b 11c 254a 641a 239a 1158b 369b 577b
0.75 5.6c 5921a 31b 246a 472c 197b 1042b 320c 1696c
Verm. (%)  
0 6.3a 5204a 65a 319a 758a 279a 1695a 398a 920a
25 6.2ab 3485b 51b 264b 586b 234b 1540a 402a 899a
50 6.2b 1717c 23c 152c 321c 158c 1127 303b 544b
Z Percentage sawdust mixed with dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and composted.
Y Percent actual nitrogen added to compost on a dry weight basis using ammonium sulfate as the N source.
X Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

 
 
Table 15. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on nutrient content of used soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.
Treatment
pH
Salinity
N
P
K
Na
Ca
Mg
S
Rep
.0004
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.8250
.0494
.1030
.0069
Sawdust (S)
.0127
.3202
.0021
.0001
.0587
.0204
.0237
.0001
.9063
Nitrogen (N)
.0001
.0142
.0001
.2197
.0001
.4161
.0001
.0001
.0001
Vermiculite (V)
.1877
.5473
.6238
.0001
.0001
.6698
.0006
.0022
.1196
S*N
.0091
.7611
.3718
.0024
.1793
.0368
.3133
.0001
.4559
S*V
.2921
.2168
.3660
.1174
.7322
.5427
.6242
.2404
.6355
N*V
.2342
.8189
.4405
.9378
.0011
.0841
.0534
.0034
.8526
S*N*V
.0252
.9701
.3938
.6451
.4005
.0463
.9256
.6821
.5326

 
 
Table 16. Main effects of organic matter and vermiculite on nutrient content of used soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.
Main
effect
pH
Salinity
(ppm)
N
(ppm)
P
(ppm)
K
(ppm)
Na
(ppm)
Ca
(ppm)
Mg
(ppm)
S
(ppm)
Sawdust (%)Z  
0 6.5aX 2285a 75a 353a 274a 483a 874a 333a 137a
50 6.4b 2006a 44b 217b 234a 427b 663b 236b 139a
Nitrogen (%)Y  
0 7.1a 1617b 20b 289a 370a 476a 1191a 367a 48c
0.37 6.5b 2648a 87a 302a 247b 451a 567b 272b 161b
0.75 5.8c 2171ab 72a 264a 144c 438a 548b 214c 208a
Verm. (%)  
0 6.4a 1990a 61a 368a 342a 470a 1023a 316a 159a
25 6.5a 2354a 64a 275b 242b 450a 707b 276b 142ab
50 6.5a 2092a 53a 212c 178c 445a 576b 261b 115b
Z Percentage sawdust mixed with dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and composted.
Y Percent actual nitrogen added to compost on a dry weight basis using ammonium sulfate as the N source.
X Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

 
Table 17. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on tissue nutrient content of marigolds produced in soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.
Treatment
N
P
K
Ca
Mg
Na
Zn
Fe
Cu
Mn
Rep
.4566
.3050
.2001
.1062
.4640
.2265
.3574
.1602
.2579
.4451
Sawdust (S)
.7224
.3167
.0079
.8233
.4554
.1726
.2881
.0507
.3163
.0452
Nitrogen (N)
.1769
.4684
.0901
.0404
.4169
.0063
.0115
.0795
.0312
.0203
Vermiculite (V)
.9143
.3339
.1861
.7646
.7861
.0086
.1304
.0002
.1162
.5242
S*N
.6160
.3061
.0162
.6818
.0132
.4565
.0032
.6374
.0234
.6418
S*V
.7287
.4280
.0371
.7408
.4980
.2733
.8543
.2117
.1300
.7907
N*V
.8797
.5434
.3475
..9548
.9472
.5372
.9052
.4502
.6866
.9850
S*N*V
.5707
.4791
.1729
.9634
.7250
.7248
.9759
.6986
.9916
.9604

 
 
Table 18. Main effects of organic matter and vermiculite on tissue nutrient content of marigolds produced in soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.
Main
effect
N
(%)
P
(%)
K
(%)
Ca
(%)
Mg
(%)
Na
(ppm)
Zn
(ppm)
Fe
(ppm)
Cu
(ppm)
Mn
(ppm)
Sawdust(%)Z  
0 3.7aX 1.3a 8.9a 1.1a 0.7a 3744a 378a 203a 17a 466b
50 3.8a 1.0a 8.4b 1.1a 0.6a 3469a 323a 283a 16a 623a
Nitrogen (%)Y  
0 3.7a 1.3a 8.9a 1.1ab 0.7a 3205b 418a 231ab 18a 436b
0.37 4.0a 1.1a 8.7ab 1.2a 0.7a 4021a 396a 304a 17a 702a
0.75 3.6a 1.0a 8.4b 1.0b 0.6a 3594ab 238b 194b 15b 499ab
Verm. (%)  
0 3.7a 1.0a 8.5a 1.1a 0.7a 3163b 418a 139b 16b 593a
25 3.7a 1.4a 8.9a 1.1a 0.6a 3744a 345ab 235b 17ab 558a
50 3.8a 1.1a 8.7a 1.1a 0.7a 3914a 289b 355a 18a 486a
Z Percentage sawdust mixed with dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and composted.
Y Percent actual nitrogen added to compost on a dry weight basis using ammonium sulfate as the N source.
X Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

 
Table 19. Probabilities of significance of treatment effects on leachate analysis of soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.
Treatment
pH
Salinity
NO3
PO4
K
Ca
Mg
Na
Cl
B
SO4
HCO3
Rep
.0001
.3471
.2711
.4637
.0001
.0026
.0153
.0001
.3814
.0001
.0547
.0011
Sawdust (S)
.0001
.0001
.0001
.7596
.0001
.0029
.6971
.0001
.2304
.0418
.0001
.0001
Nitrogen (N)
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0003
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.3368
.0051
.0001
.0001
Verm (V)
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0097
.0001
.0001
.0018
.0001
.0604
.0001
.0001
.0001
S*N
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0042
.0001
.0001
.0018
.0001
.1803
.0001
.0001
.0001
S*V
.0144
.7945
.0001
.2927
.0234
.0001
.0001
.1354
.3166
.3307
.0047
.0032
N*V
.0001
.0001
.0001
.7540
.0001
.0140
.0001
.1568
.4263
.8240
.0001
.1742
S*N*V
.0235
.2285
.0001
.0879
.0010
.8002
.3680
..0065
.4088
.5260
.0062
.1079

 
Table 20. Main effects of organic matter and vermiculite on leachate analysis of soilless growing media prepared from separated dairy cattle solid waste compost.
Main
effect
pH
Salinity
(ppm)
NO3
(ppm)
PO4
(ppm)
K
(ppm)
Ca
(ppm)
Mg
(ppm)
Na
(ppm)
Cl
(ppm)
B
(ppm)
SO4
(ppm)
HCO3
(ppm)
Sawdust (%)Z  
0 6.4aX 1667b 13.1a 3.0a 156a 38b 32a 64a 84a .29a 147b .0691a
50 6.3b 2123a 0.1b 3.1a 123b 42a 33a 67b 57a .26b 262a .0324b
Nitrogen (%)Y  
0 6.7a 783c 19.5a 1.7b 111b 13c 11c 54b 91a .25b 16c .0653a
0.37 6.4b 1642b 0..3b 3.6a 189a 49b 40b 74a 71a .30a 170b .0411b
0.75 6.0c 3260a 0.1b 4.0a 119b 58a 46a 53b 50a .27ab 427a .0458ab
Verm. (%)  
0 6.4a 2543a 9.8a 4.0a 198a 42a 33a 74a 108a .33a 262a .0663a
25 6.4a 1849b 6.9b 2.8b 135b 41a 33a 61b 61ab .27b 209b .0513b
50 6.3b 1293c 3.2c 2.3b 86c 36b 30b 46c 43b .23c 142c .0346c
Z Percentage sawdust mixed with dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques and composted.
Y Percent actual nitrogen added to compost on a dry weight basis using ammonium sulfate as the N source.
X Mean separation within main effect and column by LSD, p=0.05.

 
 
 

Project to evaluate co-composting of dairy cattle solid waste collected by hydraulic flush techniques with coarse and fine textured sawdust and poultry litter used as bulking agents.
 
 
 

Table 21. Probabilities of significance of organic matter source and blend formulation on growth and development of marigold.
Treatment
Missing
plants
Plant
height
Plant
dry wt.
Leaf
color
Degree of
flowering
General
appearance
Rep
.3536
.0028
.0001
.0013
.0022
.0004
OM
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
Blend
.0835
.0630
.3343
.0759
.3024
.3410
OM*Blend
.0386
.0762
.6612
.0455
.8221
.0366

 
 
Table 22. Main effects of organic matter source and blend formulation on growth and development of marigold.
Main
effect
Missing
plants
(no.)z
Plant
height
(cm)
Plant
dry wt.
(g)
Leaf
color
(1-5)
Degree of
flowering
(1-5)
General appearance
(1-5)
OMy            
PM 0.0b 12.6a 17.1a 4.75a 4.27a 4.60a
D 0.0b 12.1a 13.5b 4.35b 3.79b 4.04b
D/S-C 0.0b 11.1b 9.7c 3.81c 3.52b 3.13c
D/S-F 0.0b 9.7c 7.3d 4.25b 3.04c 2.97c
D/P 29.3a 0.6d 0.1e 1.35d 1.00d 1.00d
             
Blendx            
50/0/50 5.5b 9.7a 10.0a 3.8a 3.3a 3.3a
50/25/25 6.1a 9.1ab 9.9a 3.8a 3.2a 3.2a
50/50/0 6.1a 9.1ab 8.8a 3.6b 3.0a 3.1a
100/0/0 6.0a 8.9b 9.5a 3.6b 3.0a 3.1a
z Number of plants missing from a 36-count flat due to plant death.
y Organic matter source: PM=peat moss; D=solid dairy cattle waste composted alone; D/S-C=dairy waste composted with 50% sawdust (coarse texture); D/S-F=dairy waste composted with 50% sawdust (fine texture); D/P=dairy waste composted with 50% poultry litter.
x Percentage of OM/Perlite/Vermiculite in final plant growing blend.

 
 
Table 23. Probabilities of significance of organic matter source and blend formulation on growing media nutrient content.
Treatment
pH
N
P
K
Ca
Mg
Salt
Na
S
Rep
.0001
.0276
.3712
.1514
.4994
.5344
.3005
.7654
.5579
OM
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
Blend
.0001
.5338
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0025
.0001
.0001
OM*Blend
.0151
.4774
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0149
.0001
.0001

 
Table 24. Main effects of organic matter source and blend formulation on growing media nutrient content.
Main
effect
pH
(ppm)
Salinity
(ppm)
N
(ppm)
P
(ppm)
K
(ppm)
Ca
(ppm)
Mg
(ppm)
Na
(ppm)
S
(ppm)
OMy                  
PM 7.6b 634c 28b 63c 140d 2669b 175e 283d 33c
D 7.1d 2312b 195a 375b 558b 1857c 475b 414c 75b
D/S-C 7.5c 894c 32b 156c 291cd 1294d 282d 353c 58bc
D/S-F 7.7b 808c 1c 140c 420bc 2029c 369c 483b 35c
D/P 8.6a 8531a 17bc 3944a 4808a 4575a 1472a 1680a 706a
                   
Blendx                  
50/0/50 7.7b 2285b 47a 602b 713c 1914c 506b 493c 142b
50/25/25 7.7b 2688b 58a 728b 906b 2195bc 517b 592b 151b
50/50/0 7.8a 1927b 57a 713b 1024b 2268b 411c 571b 129b
100/0/0 7.6c 3643 58a 1699a 2331a 3563a 785a 914a 302a
z Number of plants missing from a 36-count flat due to plant death.
y Organic matter source: PM=peat moss; D=solid dairy cattle waste composted alone; D/S-C=dairy waste composted with 50% sawdust (coarse texture); D/S-F=dairy waste composted with 50% sawdust (fine texture); D/P=dairy waste composted with 50% poultry litter.
x Percentage of OM/Perlite/Vermiculite in final plant growing blend.

 
Table 25. Probabilities of significance of organic matter source and blend formulation on tissue nutrient content of marigold.
Treatment
N
P
K
Ca
Mg
Na
Zn
Fe
Cu
Mn
Rep
.0014
.9138
.8532
.7651
.4554
.3573
.4231
.3252
.0012
.0001
OM
.0001
.4120
.7668
.0001
.0001
.1588
.0001
.0452
.0001
.0358
Blend
.4431
.4070
.3095
.9270
.0002
.3589
.2825
.0004
.0039
.0056
OM*Blend
.6512
.0312
.1916
.1066
.5534
.5113
.1985
.1696
.0018
.0837

Table 26. Main effects of organic matter source and blend formulation on tissue nutrient content of marigold.

Main
effect
N
(%)
P
(%)
K
(%)
Ca
(%)
Mg
(%)
Na
(ppm)
Zn
(ppm)
Fe
(ppm)
Cu
(ppm)
Mn
(ppm)
OMy                    
PM 4.44bc 1.02a 4.66a 1.25a 0.56bc 3979ab 89bc 111b 9.3b 125b
D 4.21c 1.01a 4.94a 0.76c 0.71a 4374a 153a 115b 14.6a 140ab
D/S-C 4.61b 0.97a 4.75a 0.76c 0.58b 3300ab 115b 107b 10.1b 141a
D/S-F 5.02a 0.96a 4.72a 0.98b 0.50c 1977b 78c 143a 10.8b 149a
D/P
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
                     
Blendx                    
50/0/50 4.56a 0.99a 4.47a 0.96a 0.68a 3864a 97a 154a 13.4a 139b
50/25/25 4.51a 0.98a 4.77a 0.94a 0.59b 3214a 104a 122b 11.1b 132b
50/50/0 4.72a 1.03a 4.91a 0.91a 0.56bc 4259a 112a 107bc 10.1b 129b
100/0/0 4.49a 0.96a 4.93a 0.95a 0.52c 3292a 122a 93c 10.2b 157a
z Number of plants missing from a 36-count flat due to plant death.
y Organic matter source: PM=peat moss; D=solid dairy cattle waste composted alone; D/S-C=dairy waste composted with 50% sawdust (coarse texture); D/S-F=dairy waste composted with 50% sawdust (fine texture); D/P=dairy waste composted with 50% poultry litter.
x Percentage of OM/Perlite/Vermiculite in final plant growing blend.

 
 

Figure 6. Interactive effects of organic matter source and blend formulation on media sodium content.

Organic Matter Source: Blend Formulation

Figure 7. Interactive effects of organic matter source and blend formulation on media salinity.

Organic Matter Source: Blend Formulation
Table 27. Estimated economics of composting based on preliminary figures from the prototype commercial, in-vessel composter located on the Vellenga Dairy, Como, Texas.
Item
Est. fixed costs / year
Est. variable costs / year
Est. cost / cubic yd
Est. compost sales / year
Solid Waste Separator $3,791.18   $1.73  
Model # 0824 Composter $18,608.33   $8.49  
Cement Slab and Beams $315.29   0.15  
1 Acre of Land $89.51   0.04  
Land Taxes $86.00   0.04  
Concrete Storage Pad $328.43   0.15  
Tractor (25% of total use)   $1895.59 0.87  
Insurance   $1000.00 0.46  
Equipment Taxes   $710.00 0.33  
Fuel and Lubricant   $419.75 0.20  
Labor   $1095.00 0.50  
Electricity   $474.50 0.02  
         
TOTAL $23218.74 $5594.84 $13.88 $43,800.00Z
         
EST. NET PROFIT       $14,972.54
Z Based on production of 6 yd3 of compost / day valued at $20.00 / yd3.